The Sophisticated Disinfection

AN ODORLESS, HIGH STANDARD DISINFECTANT !!

Safe for humans, animals and the environment!

Works effectively against fungus, bacteria and viruses and prevents

germination lastingly!

This disinfectant is based on the metallic effect of silver and the oxidizing effect of hydrogen peroxide. The combination of these two agents results in a synergy that makes SILVER BREEZE highly effective, to even eradicate biofilms. SILVER BREEZE is one of the few disinfectants worldwide that are capable of destroying these potentially dangerous bacterial films. SILVER BREEZE is odorless, does not irritate skin or mucous membranes and does not cause allergies. SILVER BREEZE is not carcinogenic (causing cancer) or mutagenic (damaging genes).

Sleeping places of dogs and cats are a major breeding ground for pathogens. SILVER BREEZE guarantees a long lasting disinfection without inflicting any harm on the pets.

List of the until now successful tested germs


Absidia corymbiféra	Galionella sp.	Pichia membranaefaeciens
Aeromonas salmonicida	G. candidum	Poliovirus 1
Agrobacterium radiobacter		Proteus mirabilis
Alternaria alternata	Hepatitis B	Proteus vulgaris
Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis)	Hepatitis C surrogate(BVDV)	Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Aspergillus niger	Herpes simplex type 1	Pseudomonas alcaligenes
Aspergillus niger-spores	HIV-1	Pseudomonas chlororaphis
Astenionella formosa		Pseudomonas fluorescens
	Influenza A Virus	Pseudomonas spec.
Bacillus cereus		Pseudomonas syringaae pv. Tomato
Bacillus mesenterious	Klebsiella oxytoca
Bacillus subtilis	Klebsiella pneumoniae	Ralstonia picketti
Bacillus subtilis spores		Rhizopus
(S.B. Aspergillus fumigatus Adenovirus)	Lactobacillus brevis	Rotatoria g.sp-
Bacillus circulants vegetative und Sporen	Lactobacillus lindneri
Bacillus sp. Marine	Lactobacillus plantarum	Saccaromyces cerevisiae
Bacteria cinerea	Lactobacillus sp.	Saccaromyces uvarum
Bacteria erwinia	Lactobacillus wild type	Sacch. Cereivisia var. Uvarum
Botrytis cinerea	Legionella pneumophila	ssp. Carlsbergensis
Burkholderia cepacia	Leuconostoc mesenteroides	Salmonella enteritidis
	Listeria inoqua	Salmonella paratyphi
Campylobacter jejuni	Listeria monocytogenes	Salmonella sp.
Candida albicans		Salmonella typhimurium
CDC gr. IV c-2	Melosira var.	Salmonella typhi
Chlamidomonas sp.	MRSA	Salmonella typhosa
Cholera (V. cholerae)	Microsporum gypseum	Sarcina lutes
Chryseomonas luteola	Micrococcus luteus	Staphylococcus agalactiae
Chroomonas norstedtli	Micrococci marine	Staphylococcus albus
Ciliata g.sp.	Micrococcus pyogenes aureus	Staphylococcus aureus
Citro. Fre.	Micrococcus roseus	Staphylococcus faecium
Cladosporium cladosporoides	Micrococcus candidus	Staphylococcus marcescens
Clostridium novyi	Mucor	Staphylococcus hantzschlii
Clostridium perfringens	Mycobacterium phlei	Streptococcus faecalis
Clostridium sporogenes	Micobacterium smegmatis	Streptococcus lactis
Coagulase +ve staphylococci	Micobacterium spez.	Streptococcus pyogenes
Comomonas acidovorans
Corynebact.	Nagleria fowleri	Trichophyton mentagrophytes
Criptomonas sp.	Naumaniella sp.	Pseudorabies virus
	Neisseria meningitidis	Trophozoite protozoa inl. Amoebae
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus	Newcastle Disease Virus	Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium
	Nitzschia sp.	Tuberculosis, resistant strain H37RV)
ECBO Virus		Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium
Enterobacter aerogenes	Ochrobactrum anthorpi	Tuberculosis, wild-type strain)
Enterococcus faecium	Orthopoxvirus vaccinia
Enterococcus faecalis		Vaccina Virus
Enterococcus hirae	Papovavirus SV-40	VRE
Erwinia carotovora	Paramyxo Virus	V. parahaemolyticus
Eschericia coli	Pasteurella
	Pedicoccus damnosus	Xanthomonas campestris

Comparison of different disinfectant products

Standards of judgment	QUATS	PHENOLS	ALDEHYDE	HALOGENS	SILVER BREEZE

Activity field	Bacteria gram. +	Bacteria gram. +	Bacteria gram. +	Bacteria gram. +	Bacteria gram. +
	Mycosis, Yeast, Algae	Bacteria gram. -	Bacteria gram. -	Bacteria gram. -	Bacteria gram. -
	Herpes	Mycosis, Yeast,	Mycosis, Yeast, Spores	Mycosis, Yeast,	Mycosis, Yeast,
	Virus b	Virus b	Virus b/u	Virus b/u	Spores Virus b/u,
			unsheated	unsheated	Ameba
					Protozoa
Efficiency gaps	Bacteria gram. -,	Anthrax, virus unsheated,	Ameba, Protozoa	Ameba, Protozoa,	___
	Myco-bacteria, Spores,	Ameba, Biofilms	Biofilms	Biofilms
	Virus unsheated, Ameba,
	Protozoa, Biofilms
pH optimum	5 - 9	2 - 8	4 - 9	5 - 9	2 - 8
pH Stability	1- 12	1 - 14	3 - 12	1 - 9	2 - 8
Albumine torbidity and foam	considerable	not utilized	not utilized	considerable	none
deterioration in contact		modification of	modification of
with beer		color/taste	color/taste
Hard Water Compatibility	bad	very good	good	good	very good
Albumine capacity	bad	very good	bad	bad	good
Dirtiness capacity	bad	very good	unsatisfied	good	passable
Behavior on surfaces	Residues on	Absorption on rubber	high dump pressure,	Residues on	very good
	surfaces	and plastic material	air burden in rooms	surfaces
Smell	inodorous	intense	pungent	intense	inodorous
Behavior on foam	very foaming	see albumine torbidity	see albumine torbidity	good	very good
Skin compatibility	good	good in relation to the	danger of sensitization	skin and eye irritation	very good
		applicated concentration	skin and eye irritation	toxic gases
Carcinomatous	no	yes, demonstrable	yes, demonstrable	yes, formally	no
				Chloroform
(ADI) Acc. Daily Intake	0.20mg/kg				0.20 mg/kg
Mutagenicity	no	till 800 mg/kg no	yes	yes, formally	no
				Chloroform
LD50 oral on rat	350 - 900 mg/l	1'830 - 3'000 mg/l	800 - 1'700 mg/l		over 2'000 mg/l
Water compromising	3	1 - 2	1 - 2	2 - 3	0
WGK Germany
General stability diluted	at short term only	at short term only	at short term only	at short time only	very good
Temperature stability	passable	bad	bad	very bad	very good
Corrosion depending on				high	none
the applicable temperature
Bio Improvement on	90% after 5 days	100% after 3-7 days	good,	very bad	100% after 2-4 h
clarification plants		neutralization	neutralization	neutralization
		needed	needed	needed
Bio Improvement on	65-70%	80-90%	75-90%		100%
"Closed bottle Test"	within 20 days	within 20 days	within 5-10 days		within 24 h
OECD 301 D
Universal Use	restricted	restricted	restricted	passable	very good
Measurement of concentration	impossible	impossible	impossible	very good	very good
on spot
Fully automatic dosage	impossible	impossible	impossible	very good	very good

virus b = sheated virus
virus u = unsheated virus

^{Comparison between peroxide of hydrogen (H202), silver (Ag) and}

^{SILVER BREEZE}

	H₂O₂	Silver	SILVER BREEZE

Universal use	no	no	yes
Deficiency effect	yes	yes	no
Long term efficiency	no	yes	yes
Efficiency against bacteria	slow	very slow	good
Efficiency against algae	little	good	good
Efficiency against fungi and molds	little	good	good
Recontamination hinding	no	yes	yes
Immediate measurement of concentration	yes	no	yes
Neutral pH value	yes	yes	yes
Light sensibility	yes	yes	insignificant
Temperature sensibility	yes	yes	insignificant
Sensibility against UV rays	yes	yes	insignificant
Long term of stocking	no	yes	yes
Efficiency in organic water	yes	no	yes
Efficiency against biofilms	no	no	yes
Quantity of requested dosage	high	very high	economic

Comparison between the peracid acetic products and

SILVER BREEZE

	peracid acetic base	SILVER BREEZE

Universal use	no	yes
Deficiency effect	yes	no
Smell	sour	practically none
Prejudice of consistence in	yes	no
relation of smell and taste of
aliments and beverage treated
Necessary rinsing	yes	no
Corrosion	yes	no
Piling up of packings	restricted	yes
Completely automatic regulation	no	yes
pH Application field	2.5 - 4.0	1-8
Temperature in the	5°C - 40°C	5°C - 95°C
application field	over 65°C danger of explosion
Neutralization of domestic water	yes	no
Rapidity in destruction of germs	speedy	middle

Comparison between "Quats" and

SILVER BREEZE

	Quats	SILVER BREEZE

Smell Formation	yes	non
Taste Modification	yes	non
Chemical connections with	yes	non
other basic materials
Needed contact time	high temp.: short	middle
to destroy bacteria	low temp.: long
Temperature sensibility	little	very little
Total decomposition	no	practically none
Foam Formation	yes	non
Rinsing	bad	very good
Coating formation with	yes	non
high temperature water
Albumine turbidity and	yes	non
foam deterioration in case
of contact with beer
Toxicity according to dosage	yes	non
Danger in case of excessive dosage	yes	non
Concentration of measurement	bad	good

Comparison between Chlorine and

SILVER BREEZE

	Chlorine	SILVER BREEZE

Long Term Efficiency	according to temperature	very long
	short - middle
Light Sensibility	middle	practically none
Temperature Sensibility	speedy decomposition in	practically none
	case of raising temperature
pH Neutralization	pH modification	neutral
	of the treated water
Efficiency Rapidity	yes	middle
Efficiency Delay	yes	yes
due to organic materials
Ammoniac Influence	Chloramine	none till
Urea	formation	5 mg
Algae Effect	restricted	yes
Mycosis Effect	restricted	yes
Smell Formation	yes	no
Taste Modification	yes	no
Danger in case of excessive doses	yes	practically none
Carcinogen / Mutagenic	successive product: yes	no

Disinfectant spray approved by Swiss Authorities

SILVER BREEZE has been approved by the Swiss Federal Health Office (SFOPH.) and has been registered with the following numbers as a disinfectant spray for commerce:

(Swiss Federal Office of Public Health)

SFOPH T Nr. (Swiss legislation): 104893

Poisoning class (Swiss legislation): free

SFOPH E Nr. (Swiss regulation on disinfectant products): 1520

Extracts from the Swiss regulation:

According to the regulation on disinfectant and disinfection products, SILVER BREEZE is approved by the chemical department of SFOPH and has been added to the toxicological list. This product must fulfil the requirements of the toxicological norms, as well as the regulation on disinfectant and disinfection products, before being placed on the market.

Each product on the market needs a registration dossier that must be transmitted to the chemical department.

The biocides of chemical disinfectants reduce the numbers of microbes on surfaces, the structure or metabolism of the microbe is destroyed. For a product to be considered effective, a sufficient number of micro-organisms have to be eliminated.

It is the duty of the registered to prove the effectiveness of the product. The microbes are subdivided into bacteria, mycosis, myco-bacteria (pathogen of tuberculosis), viruses and spore-forming bacteria.

In order to define a product as “disinfectant” in Switzerland, it must be capable to act against bacteria and mycosis. The effectiveness is tested on a certain quantity of bacteria and mycosis, which can change according to the regulations in force. In addition to the standard requirements, further organisms, such as salmonellas, viruses, myco-bacteria, spores, etc have to be specifically listed on the label. The effectiveness of each single group has to be demonstrated separately.

SFOPH carry out an evaluation of the dossier, and decide the effectiveness of the disinfectant from the reports received from the experts. The text on the label and the instructions must be conform to the properties and the effectiveness.

Once the above requirements are fulfilled, the disinfectants receives approval and a SFOPH-E number.

Anaylses for the determination of the effectiveness (according to SFOPH requirements)

In order to prove the effectiveness of a product, the experts have established standard tests, wherein the general principles are listed.

For over 20 years, standard tests exist in various countries. In order to unify the methods of these tests, and the evaluation of the Control Authorities, the European Committee for the Standardization (CEN) has created a technical committee for disinfectant products, the CT216. We are in a transition phase, in which, to prove the effectiveness of a product, it must fulfil the “regional” tests, some of which are existing since a short or a long period (AFNOR,DGHM), as well as the European regulations.

The evaluations will be approved according to the general pre-established regulations, which are existing since a long time, except when these diverge excessively from the European regulations.

In order to establish the properties of the biocides, an experimental part consisting of three phases has been supplied. Each phase or stage supplies further information regarding the strong and weak points of the product.

Phase 1:

Phase 1 consists on a qualitative suspension test. An evaluation takes place to see if the product has a basic effect against specific organisms. The product is diluted with water in order to reach various concentrations. This is a qualitative test, as the result will show if the product, in the various tested concentrations, is effective or not. Further interfering substances are not added in this phase of the tested concentrations.

Phase 2:

Phase 2/Stage 1 consists on a quantitative suspension test. Not only the product is diluted in water, but interfering substances are added, which stimulate an organic load. Such a load is often encountered in practice, since we find dirty surfaces, instruments or hands to be disinfected. This phase is important, since certain substances react to proteins and in this way are hindered, and the product looses its effectiveness. It is a quantitative test, as the reduction of the number of specific organisms, calculated in log10-stages is transmitted.

Phase 3:

Phase 3/Stage 2 exposes a decisive stage, as the experimental conditions of the tests are confronted with the circumstances, which predominate during the application in practice. In other words, practical conditions are created with these tests. Contrary to the tests of the two above-mentioned stages, which are the same for all types of application, in this last phase, the tests differ according to the field of application of the disinfectant.

SILVER BREEZE, produced for the public, serves as a disinfectant for surfaces, and therefore has been tested in phase 3 being considered suitable in this application field.

These three test phases supply the necessary knowledge for the approval of the effectiveness of SILVER BREEZE, produced for the public, effective against various specific organisms, efficient on various concentrations of application and effective within established time limits. Since these tests are standardized, a reliable confrontation of the compositions of the various active substances is possible.

SILVER BREEZE has been classified by the Control Authorities as a very effective disinfectant, since the reduction of the number of micro-organisms treated with SILVER BREEZE has satisfied the severe legislative requirements, which is more than:

5 log 10 for bacteria

4 log 10 for mycosis

4 log 10 for viruses

Various micro-organisms used for the diverse phases of tests 1 – 3

- Enterovirus Polio1, Stamm SABIN, culture on cell VERO

- Adenovirus human Typus, culture on cell KB

- Orthopoxvirus Vaccinia, culture on cell VERO

- Aspergillus niger, ATCC 8739

- Candida albicans, ATCC 10231

- E. coli, ATCC 10536 and 25922, K12 NCTC 10535